<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Glam&#8217;s Not A Sham</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/</link>
	<description>Daily Beauty Tips and Makeup Advice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:56:03 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Beauty Blogs &#187; Smarter Beauty Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-3086</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Beauty Blogs &#187; Smarter Beauty Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2007 17:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebeautydaily.com/glams-not-a-sham/#comment-3086</guid>
		<description>[...] Earlier this week, the Glam Network was defended in &#8220;Glam&#8217;s Not a Sham&#8221; on eBeautyDaily. The question of &#8220;Who owns Who&#8221; in the beauty industry is answered by Kiss and Makeup.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Earlier this week, the Glam Network was defended in &#8220;Glam&#8217;s Not a Sham&#8221; on eBeautyDaily. The question of &#8220;Who owns Who&#8221; in the beauty industry is answered by Kiss and Makeup.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-3033</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 03:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebeautydaily.com/glams-not-a-sham/#comment-3033</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael - you&#039;re definitely right in a lot of your points.  Businesses come and go every day, failing for a lot of different reasons.  It boils down to me knowing what I am doing and accepting the risks.  CYA is the only way to go in my opinion - don&#039;t put all your chickens in one basket.  And don&#039;t ask me to sign an exclusive agreement unless you&#039;re BIG willling to pay for it. :)    Glam has not done that to me - they have been great partners to have, and I hope they stay that way.  I think they will.  So far, things are sunny and bright, and we are all on an upswing, and they are attracting wonderful advertisers and traffic that are beneficial to both of us.  I feel the relationship at this point is very symbiotic, and I think b5media as a whole feels the same way.  Blogging in this niche is rewarding in a lot of different ways, not just in advertising revenue, and Glam understands that in a way that other advertising networks don&#039;t.  Maybe they will start, maybe they won&#039;t - who knows.  I just keep my seatbelt tightly fastened - Web 2.0 is a wild ride.  ;)  Thanks for your time and comment, Michael!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael &#8211; you&#8217;re definitely right in a lot of your points.  Businesses come and go every day, failing for a lot of different reasons.  It boils down to me knowing what I am doing and accepting the risks.  CYA is the only way to go in my opinion &#8211; don&#8217;t put all your chickens in one basket.  And don&#8217;t ask me to sign an exclusive agreement unless you&#8217;re BIG willling to pay for it. <img src='http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />     Glam has not done that to me &#8211; they have been great partners to have, and I hope they stay that way.  I think they will.  So far, things are sunny and bright, and we are all on an upswing, and they are attracting wonderful advertisers and traffic that are beneficial to both of us.  I feel the relationship at this point is very symbiotic, and I think b5media as a whole feels the same way.  Blogging in this niche is rewarding in a lot of different ways, not just in advertising revenue, and Glam understands that in a way that other advertising networks don&#8217;t.  Maybe they will start, maybe they won&#8217;t &#8211; who knows.  I just keep my seatbelt tightly fastened &#8211; Web 2.0 is a wild ride.  <img src='http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />   Thanks for your time and comment, Michael!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-3031</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebeautydaily.com/glams-not-a-sham/#comment-3031</guid>
		<description>This sounds like the process IGN went through years ago.

Step 1)
Get a whole bunch of affiliate sites. Tie them into exclusive ad contracts. Use the affiliate sites as a source of traffic to promote the core site. Occasionally push some traffic to the affiliate sites to keep them happy.

Benefit to affiliate sites: more ad revenue than they can probably generate themselves. Occasionally get bits of traffic from the core site.

Benefit to Glam / IGN: free promotion from a whole bunch of affiliate sites.

Claim aggregate traffic from all affiliate sites as being their own, so they can say â€œwow look how big weâ€™ve grown in such a short amount of timeâ€.

Step 2)
Use resources to consistently produce better content than the affiliate sites, thus retaining more traffic. Make sure all high paying CPM ads go to the core company owned sites. Keep paying affiliate sites enough to keep them happy and to prevent them going to another network.

Step 3)
Once youâ€™ve built up enough traffic, start letting affiliate sites go. Or in IGNâ€™s case, if the ad market dips and you find yourself locked into unfavorable contracts, simply stop honoring the 3-5 year contracts by ceasing to make payments to the affiliates. By this stage the affiliates have quit their full time jobs to focus on their sites, believing they have a secure contract and are getting paid to do what they love. For this reason I suggest affiliates always have a Plan B.

Step 4)
Affiliate sites close down or go bust. Network traffic isnâ€™t really impacted by much, because by now most people go to Glam.com / IGN.com as thatâ€™s the url theyâ€™re used to seeing plastered all over the affiliate sites. IGN / Glam site keep all high paying ad inventory on their now much bigger core sites.

Step 5)
Sell out or do an IPO. Founders become rich. Affiliates that helped them get there, get nothing.

Having been through the whole IGN experience myself I can see this happening again. Mind you, if I owned Glam, I would probably do exactly what theyâ€™re doing now. You can see why :)

While affiliate sites might say they are getting â€˜good trafficâ€™ from Glam, itâ€™s probably nowhere near as much as the traffic they are sending back to Glam, or at least is equal to the value of the brand recognition Glam gets from sticking the Glam logo all over affiliate sites. Also, yes things are all nice and rosy now, while CPMs are high and affiliates are getting good support because the company can afford to pay for an affiliate manager to talk to the affiliates. But what happens when CPMs dip, the affiliate manager loses her job as the company tries to cut costs, sites stop getting paid? Iâ€™m not saying this is going to happen, but what if it did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like the process IGN went through years ago.</p>
<p>Step 1)<br />
Get a whole bunch of affiliate sites. Tie them into exclusive ad contracts. Use the affiliate sites as a source of traffic to promote the core site. Occasionally push some traffic to the affiliate sites to keep them happy.</p>
<p>Benefit to affiliate sites: more ad revenue than they can probably generate themselves. Occasionally get bits of traffic from the core site.</p>
<p>Benefit to Glam / IGN: free promotion from a whole bunch of affiliate sites.</p>
<p>Claim aggregate traffic from all affiliate sites as being their own, so they can say â€œwow look how big weâ€™ve grown in such a short amount of timeâ€.</p>
<p>Step 2)<br />
Use resources to consistently produce better content than the affiliate sites, thus retaining more traffic. Make sure all high paying CPM ads go to the core company owned sites. Keep paying affiliate sites enough to keep them happy and to prevent them going to another network.</p>
<p>Step 3)<br />
Once youâ€™ve built up enough traffic, start letting affiliate sites go. Or in IGNâ€™s case, if the ad market dips and you find yourself locked into unfavorable contracts, simply stop honoring the 3-5 year contracts by ceasing to make payments to the affiliates. By this stage the affiliates have quit their full time jobs to focus on their sites, believing they have a secure contract and are getting paid to do what they love. For this reason I suggest affiliates always have a Plan B.</p>
<p>Step 4)<br />
Affiliate sites close down or go bust. Network traffic isnâ€™t really impacted by much, because by now most people go to Glam.com / IGN.com as thatâ€™s the url theyâ€™re used to seeing plastered all over the affiliate sites. IGN / Glam site keep all high paying ad inventory on their now much bigger core sites.</p>
<p>Step 5)<br />
Sell out or do an IPO. Founders become rich. Affiliates that helped them get there, get nothing.</p>
<p>Having been through the whole IGN experience myself I can see this happening again. Mind you, if I owned Glam, I would probably do exactly what theyâ€™re doing now. You can see why <img src='http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>While affiliate sites might say they are getting â€˜good trafficâ€™ from Glam, itâ€™s probably nowhere near as much as the traffic they are sending back to Glam, or at least is equal to the value of the brand recognition Glam gets from sticking the Glam logo all over affiliate sites. Also, yes things are all nice and rosy now, while CPMs are high and affiliates are getting good support because the company can afford to pay for an affiliate manager to talk to the affiliates. But what happens when CPMs dip, the affiliate manager loses her job as the company tries to cut costs, sites stop getting paid? Iâ€™m not saying this is going to happen, but what if it did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glam Media Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-3028</link>
		<dc:creator>Glam Media Controversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebeautydaily.com/glams-not-a-sham/#comment-3028</guid>
		<description>[...] view: TC and VB are trying to make Glam out to be nothing but a shadow of what it says it is. Read the whole article at eBeauty Daily.  ad network, ebeauty daily, glam media, glam network, sham, techcrunch, venturebeat, woman, women, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] view: TC and VB are trying to make Glam out to be nothing but a shadow of what it says it is. Read the whole article at eBeauty Daily.  ad network, ebeauty daily, glam media, glam network, sham, techcrunch, venturebeat, woman, women, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chloe</title>
		<link>http://www.splendicity.com/ebeautydaily/glams-not-a-sham/comment-page-1/#comment-3024</link>
		<dc:creator>Chloe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ebeautydaily.com/glams-not-a-sham/#comment-3024</guid>
		<description>How sad - people seem to love tearing down successful, whether it&#039;s successful people or companies.  I love blogging with Glam and wish them all the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How sad &#8211; people seem to love tearing down successful, whether it&#8217;s successful people or companies.  I love blogging with Glam and wish them all the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
