5 Reasons You Should NOT Wear Mid-Calf Nude Footless Tights
October 25, 2007 by Dexie Wharton
Filed under A Little Bit Of Help, SIL Bag Of Tricks, SIL Fashion Dont's, Style It Less Advices
- You’re a grown chic and sophisticated woman. Not an infant, a toddler or a cute girl in grade school.
- Footless Tights, nude or otherwise does not make sense.
- You will look so desperate trying to be “trendy”
- You don’t want to be accused of being a Sienna Miller wannabe.
- And the most imperative reason of them all. I will spank your butt(no it won’t be a *rowr* moment for you) with my stylish fashion wand. Then I will take your credit cards and force you to listen to me talk to the Bank canceling all of them then I’ll make you watch me put them in the shredder. One by one by one. Then I’ll ground you from shopping for a month. Maybe.
Copish?, alrighty. Let’s move on…. 
Here’s another reason: it’s not long enough to tuck into your Uggs!
LOL @ Mare
I don’t think I’ll ever figure out WHY some people think these are cute. oO Especially in nude, JUST GO BARE or wear tights! Aiyah.
Going bare is sexy so I don’t know why they opt for nude footless tights either.
When did women/girls start thinking bare was sexier than hose? Girls, pantyhose/tights rule if worn the correct way any day over going bare!
Yea… mid calf is weird… but I do wear ones that are knee length. Am I still an offender.
the photo: so NOT chic!
Why would they even make em. just so wrong
hehehheeh looks funny
I hate them!!!!!!!!!!11
that pic does look really weird.
I’ve never seen them in that skin tone color you found.
It looks like she has a really odd tan
Like the skirt in the picture.
Don’t like anything else.
Mid calf tights \are weird
ya refrain from buying these lol
hehe, i find myself wtih 343455665678812399 pairs of these..
for dance.